StudentShare
Contact Us
Sign In / Sign Up for FREE
Search
Go to advanced search...
Free

Is Homosexuality Morally Permissible - Assignment Example

Cite this document
Summary
In the paper “Is Homosexuality Morally Permissible?” the author provides the discourse on the morality behind homosexuality. A question that every concerned individual has sought answers is, whether or not, homosexuality is morally permissible…
Download full paper File format: .doc, available for editing
GRAB THE BEST PAPER97% of users find it useful
Is Homosexuality Morally Permissible
Read Text Preview

Extract of sample "Is Homosexuality Morally Permissible"

Outline Is Homosexuality Morally Permissible? Shary Zhou Prof. Colaner Ucore 2900 5.5 The dis on the morality behind homosexuality has been trending the global affairs in the past couple of years. A question that every concerned individual has sought answers is, whether or not, homosexuality is morally permissible. John Corvino, professor of philosophy at Wayne State University in Indiana, is among the proponents who have come up explicitly in defense of homosexuality. In his masterpiece titled “Why Shouldnt Tommy and Jim Have Sex? A defense of Homosexuality,” Corvino argues, basing on five definitions of unnatural, that labeling homosexuality as unnatural act is nonsensical and, therefore, could not form the moral ground for dispelling such a form of sexual orientation. In conclusion, this author asserts that homosexual sex is not morally evil but is morally good. Corvino submission has, however, not gone unparalleled by opponents who feel that homosexuality is immoral. Obasola, Kehinde E., a professor in the Department of Religious Studies Olabisi Onabanjo University addresses this debate in his article titled “Ethical Perspective Of Homosexuality Among The African People.” His main argument against this practice is the abnormality that accompanies the act. For instance, human sexual bodies are developed for reproduction. Therefore, homosexuality is an acquired trait rather than innate. It is a distortion to the biological and psychological components of the body. This among several other reasons makes it to be morally unacceptable. In my forthcoming essay on this debate, I hold the opinion that opposes Corvino’s argument in favor of homosexuality. His arguing on the basis definition of unnatural does not hold water in so far as morality is concerned. Homosexuality is unnatural, and defies the sanctity of marriage, a natural institution designed for reproduction. It is therefore immoral. Corvino asserts that attributing homosexuality as unnatural stems from five basic interpretations of what is unnatural. In the very beginning, he objects the very idea of what is natural and its acceptance or likeableness in society. For instance, many lifestyle choices (housing, government, medicine, and even clothing) that are cherished by people at large are unnatural. On the other hand, some “natural” things are completely detested by society, such as, death, disease, and suffering. Subtly regarding “unnaturalness” as “rhetorical flourish,” Corvino challenges the very foundation of opposition (309). Corvino elaborates five different possible meanings of unnaturalness by borrowing it from Burton Leiser and disregard its relevance with morality of homosexuality. Corvino starts with the common perception of unnaturalness as deviation from the norm. It is believed that what is unusual and abnormal for most people is not natural. Because most people engage in heterosexual activity, it is considered natural. But there is no way to imply that those who do the opposite are unnatural. If this justification is assumed to be true, what about “relatively few people (who) read Sanskrit, pilot ships, play the mandolin, breed goats, or write with both hands,” Corvino (310) states. Can we attribute them “unnatural,” and their activity as immoral? Unusualness does not equate unnaturalness. Moreover, it is evident that statistical frequency of a certain action holds no ground to define its morality. Therefore, Corvino concludes that homosexuality can be considered unusual due to minority of people practicing it; however, it has no connection with its morality. In other possible definition of unnatural, it is assumed that animals are not homosexual, therefore, it is wrong. Corvino asserts that this argument is doubly flawed. Firstly, because it is built on a false premise that animals are not homosexual. Secondly, a particular practice cannot be attributed as immoral just because animals don’t practice it. After all, animals don’t brush their teeth, cook their food, attend college, and participate in religious ceremonies. Finally, he finds it amusing to look towards animals for human standards, especially sexual ones. Third assumption is that homosexuality does not proceed from innate desire, therefore, it is unnatural. Some suggest that homosexuals are “born that way,” therefore, it’s natural and good. Others attribute it to be a lifestyle choice, therefore, unnatural. Corvino asserts that both sides are wrong since they assume a connection between origin and morality of homosexuality. First one assumes that all the innate desires are good, therefore, they should be followed. Here, Corvino puts forth a question that whether the innate desire of some people who are more inclined towards violence should be treated similarly. Thus, homosexuality cannot be attributed as wrong or right on the basis of its innateness. Furthermore, if someone does not have any innate tendency to write with left hand, but he writes with left hand anyway, it does not make writing with left hand an immoral practice. Therefore, attributing homosexuality as a lifestyle does not imply that it’s an immoral lifestyle choice. It is evident that humans don’t seem to choose their feelings in obvious ways. All of us find someone more attractive than the other and certain activities more arousing, irrespective of what we decide; therefore, origin of feelings is still unable to decide its morality. Corvino analyses another possible definition of unnatural that if an organ’s principal purpose is violated, it is unnatural. This argument assumes that homosexual sex involves human genitals, but it does not result in procreation. This argument assumes that every human organ has a certain purpose and it is immoral to use an organ that is deviated from its principal purpose. If a man’s mouth’s principal purpose is to eat, breath, kiss woman, why it is unnatural to kiss a man? If the purpose of genitals is to procreate, we can’t say that expressing love, giving and receiving pleasure through these organs is unnatural. If human organs have only one purpose, opponents of homosexuality have to justify sex in sterile couple, sex during pregnancy, masturbation, and use of contraception. All of these activities involve genitals but do not result in procreation, do the ‘principal purpose of a human organ’ believers attribute these activities as unnatural or immoral. Procreation in a homosexual relationship is as unlikely as it is in a relationship of a man and women without her uterus. Therefore, the inference that homosexual relationship is unnatural seems no argument at all. The last potential meaning of unnatural refers that it is simply offensive or disgusting. Homosexuality is often considered offensive or disgusting. Corvino argues that we feel disgusted or offended by morally neutral activities, such as, people eating snail, performing autopsies, and cleaning toilet. Moreover, people regarded interracial relationships as disgusting for centuries but it is never proved wrong. In sum, Corvino dismisses the charge that homosexuality is unnatural. He finds it to be a ‘rhetorical flourish rather than a philosophical cogency,’ and aesthetics rather than morality as its base. On the other hand, Obasola, Kehinde asserts that homosexual people engage in an abnormal and unnatural activity. The main argument against homosexuality is its inability to conform to the principals of procreation. Marriage is a sacred institution that creates a balance in society. Human sexual bodies are designed for opposite sex relationship and reproduction. One may argue for the case of an infertile woman, I would say that infertile woman or impotent man, for that matter, is not comparable to a man to man relationship since they are still a couple and fulfilling their natural desire. Procreation is the ultimate purpose of sex, therefore, infertility or impotence can be considered as a disease or abnormality that cannot lead to procreation. There is no way we can justify homosexual sex with such failure in procreation since it is not acquired but given. Medical science has seen many breakthroughs in past, there is a possibility of miracle in case of infertile woman or impotent man, but there is no chance of procreation in a homosexual relationship that makes it unnatural. Another argument against homosexuality is that If God has to approve homosexuality, he would have created ‘Adam and Steve’ (81) rather than Adam and Eve. In addition to pleasure and intimacy, man and women relationship has a greater purpose of ‘fulfilling the divine mandate to replenish earth’ (84). It is evident that homosexuality is an acquired trait for humans rather than natural one. Human beings and other evolved living beings are created in pairs for a purpose. It is possible that some of the animals have also acquired homosexual behavior due to some reason, but it does not make the behavior natural. Moreover, it does not imply that human beings should consider them a standard of some sort. It violates biological and psychological needs of human body. If we consider the bigger picture, homosexuality strikes at the very foundation of human creation and threatens the ultimate survival of human race. Kehinde concludes that homosexuality is dehumanizing and “a mockery of the divine image with which humans were originally made” (84). In my opinion, Corvino’s arguments on the basis of rejecting possible meanings of unnatural do not prove that homosexuality is moral. In an effort to dismiss the connection between homosexuality and unnaturalness, he overlooked the fact that everything natural has a particular purpose while the practice of homosexuality is devoid of it. Even if we assume that homosexual feelings are natural, not acquired, Corvino himself rejected the idea that every natural or innate feeling cannot be entertained and legitimized. Furthermore, homosexuality is not functional. Despite being practiced for thousands of years, homosexuality couldn’t be more than pleasure. Nature is a completely evolved system, in addition to amusement and beauty, its every component has a purpose, but homosexuality does not fit into the bigger picture. It is not part of the puzzle and game of the world is complete without it. It is a practice that does not fit in nature’s plan, therefore, it is unnatural. It defies the sanctity of marriage or male-female relationship, a natural institution developed for reproduction, therefore, it is immoral. Word Count=1585 Read More
Cite this document
  • APA
  • MLA
  • CHICAGO
(“Ethical Reasoning Final Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1500 words”, n.d.)
Retrieved from https://studentshare.org/social-science/1647668-ethical-reasoning-final-essay
(Ethical Reasoning Final Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1500 Words)
https://studentshare.org/social-science/1647668-ethical-reasoning-final-essay.
“Ethical Reasoning Final Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1500 Words”, n.d. https://studentshare.org/social-science/1647668-ethical-reasoning-final-essay.
  • Cited: 0 times

CHECK THESE SAMPLES OF Is Homosexuality Morally Permissible

Kants morally impermissible actions

Logic as the Basis for Ethics: What action can be described as permissible and hence the converse implies impermissibility?... An action is said to be permissible if its cause can be found to be logically consistent and an action is said to be impermissible if its cause is found to be irrational, inconsistent or contradictory (Sullivan 163).... permissible actions are as defined above are those that are because of a consistent motive and are done out of moral duty....
4 Pages (1000 words) Essay

Bowers vs Hardwick and Lawrence vs Texas

Texas are two landmark decisions of the Supreme Court of United State - made 17 years apart - that demonstrate the sea change in the attitude and outlook of the American judicial system and indeed the American life in general, towards homosexuality.... Hardwick due mainly to the changes in attitudes, perceptions and views on homosexuality in the country (Harms, 2011).... It was therefore no wonder that more than half the states still had rules in place that outlawed sodomy which was viewed as one of the practices that many felt made homosexuality abhorrent....
7 Pages (1750 words) Assignment

Is Euthanasia Morally Permissible

hellip; Yet if euthanasia is morally wrong, it still should not be restricted via law, as if a patient desires to die, that is strictly a personal affair, in spite of how irrational or immoral the need may be.... My position is almost identical, for I do consider some instances of euthanasia to be morally wrong, if it is not voluntarily, however I also believe it ought to unquestionably authorize if it is asked for. Society has its own moral obligation to respect individual autonomy when we can do so without infringing on the rights of others....
7 Pages (1750 words) Essay

Debate against Homosexual Marriages

hellip; Through a detailed analysis surrounding the grounds by which homosexual marriages should not be permitted, an examination of homosexuality and its oppositional arguments will be established by focusing on homosexuality as a sin, weakened traditional family values, and the misrepresentation of marital benefits.... Thus, both sexual acts in marriage, or not, are considered forbidden due to their promiscuous nature, which is directly associated to homosexuality because it's sexual acts, in marriage or not, is still a sin....
8 Pages (2000 words) Essay

It ask to look critically at a contemporary social or cultural issue

According to these anthropologists, societies refrained from shunning such acts because they deemed them permissible.... Psychologists classify homosexuality as a sexual orientation, which they define as unconscious,… enduring traits that influence an individuals romantic and sexual attraction towards members of the opposite sex (heterosexuals) or members of both sexes (bi-sexual).... This discussion also tries to analyze the context of homosexuality in contemporary society by analyzing the international reactions on homosexuality....
4 Pages (1000 words) Essay

Abortion Law in Canada

Abortion can be defined as the cessation of a pregnancy after, accompanied by, eliciting in, the death of the fetus due to; impulsive removal of a human fetus in the course of the first twelve weeks of incubation, it can also be due to prompted ejection of a human fetus.... Induced… Canada is among the few nations in the world that lack criminal law limiting abortion practice....
6 Pages (1500 words) Assignment

Acknowledgment of the Gay or Lesbian Lives

The outing is permissible and has an expected consequence of living morally.... The more convincing argument is that outing is morally required since outing entails revealing the sexual orientation and not the sexual behaviors of these individuals.... he more convincing argument is that outing is morally required since outing entails revealing the sexual orientation and not the sexual behaviors of these individuals.... However, outings could also lead to an individual being wrongly judged in society since most society members do not accept homosexuality....
7 Pages (1750 words) Essay

The Permissibility of Abortion and Legalization of Drugs

nbsp; Some of the arguments about abortion that Thomson responds to are:  Impermissible even if to protect mothers life, permissible to save mom only if executed by mother herself not the third party, the fetus has right to life and therefore right to use mothers body, the fetus has right to use moms body, we are compelled by nature so we ought to be driven by law to be good Samaritans, the female gender should want to be good Samaritans and carry a baby for a full term (nine months), fetus not only an individual but one for whom the woman has distinctive relationship owing to the fact mother that it's hers, abortion is not ever allowable (absolutist view) in the society (Boonin 151)....
7 Pages (1750 words) Assignment
sponsored ads
We use cookies to create the best experience for you. Keep on browsing if you are OK with that, or find out how to manage cookies.
Contact Us