StudentShare
Contact Us
Sign In / Sign Up for FREE
Search
Go to advanced search...
Free

The Experience Machine Argument - Report Example

Cite this document
Summary
The report 'The Experience Machine Argument" focuses on the critical analysis of the peculiarities, suggestions, and criticism of the Experience Machine argument introduced by Robert Nozick, a famous philosopher who came to be broadly referred to as the father of philosophical libertarianism…
Download full paper File format: .doc, available for editing
GRAB THE BEST PAPER98.8% of users find it useful
The Experience Machine Argument
Read Text Preview

Extract of sample "The Experience Machine Argument"

Affiliation Introduction Robert Nozick was a famous philosopher who came to be broadly referred to as the father of philosophical libertarianism. Nozick drafted a view on how free willpower is very possible. How with no causal determination of any action, an individual could have behaved differently yet does not behave randomly or arbitrarily. Regardless approaching the situation from different directions, Nozick found it so obstinate, so resilient to illuminating solutions, and he was forced to conclude that no one of the tactics is completely satisfactory (Ethem 11) Nozicks experience machine is viewed to make a convincing, if not irrefutable, case against hedonism. In Nozicks experiment, we are summoned to consider the outlook of a fools paradise from given perspective and to choose whether we will prefer the hedonic illusion which the experience machine offers or a hedonically lesser state of doing things. Nozick proposes that we select the latter (Ethem 11). The Experience Machine The experience machine of Robert Nozick, which attacks hedonism, is among the most renowned thought experiments in modern philosophy (Baber). The experience machine has convinced many people that there is more to a sensible value than the feeling quality of peoples experiences. Nevertheless, the experiment has been often misunderstood and very easily dismissed (Baber). What is the experience machine argument? For instance, lets take hedonism that states that whatever that is intrinsically good is nothing but what matters most is the balance of pleasure over the pain experienced. It does not matter how someone understands pleasure, so long as its a non-fictive psychological state (Ethem 11). If an individuals life comprises as much pleasure and as less pain as it is possible for that individual. There exists no way to improve that persons life. It is just the hedonic excellence of experience which eventually matters for prudential value (Ethem 11). Primordial counterexample to hedonism suggests that one is worse off if he falsely believes that his partner is faithful to him (and possibly take pleasure in it) than if his partner is faithful to him. Robertss Experience Machine experiment extracts the same vein (Ethem 11). However, it further generalizes the point and thus eliminating some distractions like the influence of the thought about cheating that will make one feel bad because of that (Baber). The most basic point is because the Experience Machine offers the perfect illusion of living whatever kind of life they desire, while one sails about in a tank (Kodali & Venkata). Nozick brings into table two unlike questions relating to plugging into that machine. In the first question he asks whether one should plug into this kind of machine for life, preprogramming his lifes experiences while he asked in the second question whether one would just plug in. The difference between the two questions is very important, but too often neglected. The former question is a normative question; I believe that it accepts an answer to an evaluative type of question such that if hedonism is quite true, then one should plug in. The latter question is a question involving preferences, instead of what is genuinely valuable. When Robert Nozick asks whether one would plug in (instead of whether it would be somehow better for him to plug in), he is taking the dialectical step against hedonist. This approach is, in some way, a harmless move, as it evades commitment to reactions from people or to allowing an extrapolation from preferences towards evaluative truth. It therefore cannot be refuted by the general skeptical arguments or experimental studies of what individuals in general think (Michael). I think; it is legitimate, to address people in this way when it comes to philosophical argumentations. Nozicks Suggested Experience Machine Argument Encountered by the choice of life such as in the Experience Machine as well as a qualitatively inferior life in reality, most individuals would not prefer the former. Individuals consider preferences to reflect their convictions about value. Individuals consider convictions about value to be more reliable guides to value, and therefore good evidence of what is genuinely valuable (Ethem 11). Henceforth, people have good confirmation of other possessions being more valuable than the quality of hedonic experience. It is uncalled-for to defeat hedonism, and might confuse some individuals, who dismiss the argument for solid reasons (Ethem 11). Criticism of the Experience Machine Argument Top of Form There are different criticisms that have since arisen to negate Nozicks Argumentation. For instance, one of the popular criticisms is the one that makes the case in "Utilitarianism" through pointing out that utility (pleasure/happiness) should not solely be measured by the physical senses since "some types of pleasure are more valuable and desirable than others. The criticism says that an individual of advanced faculties needs more to make him contented. It further states that is better to be a human being dissatisfied than a pig satisfied; better one to be Socrates dissatisfied than a fool satisfied (Kodali & Venkata). Other critics argue that engaging into such a machine removes self identity (Ethem 11). Just to draft something out it, at the time one is presented the choice it is central to their sense of self that they are trying to decide how to proceed with the choice. To someone thinking about this choice, becoming a person who is just experiencing the most pleasure they can feels like a personality ending choice (Ethem 11). I think this is analogous to the classic experiment I heard regarding whether you would let yourself lose all memories if you would wake up with much money. In this way, the person says no because they feel that going into the machine kills them; and makes the choice self-harming. Bottom of Form Response to the Criticisms The thought experiment of Robert Nozick is pretty straight forward. Many philosophers are sort of invested in attempting to critique his position for the argument. And of course the more one looks into it, the more they find his argument fairly difficult to reject. That is because pleasure can still be considered to be the motive for choosing not go into the machine and therefore defeat Nozicks argument (Kodali & Venkata). My general strategy is to display that the decision of going in the machine is less pleasurable than the one of not going it into it and living your life in reality. Top of Form The critics are making valid points, but I believe they are just trying to refute Nozicks argument for no strong purpose and the idea that people cannot encounter deeper realities within the machine is part of Nozicks argument. Nozicks Argument was on paper as a case in opposition to hedonism, and he wanted to show that hedonism is faulty because if contentment were, in actual fact, the only inherent value, we all jump into would the experience machine without hesitation. However, Nozick proves that the pleasure is not the only intrinsic value for reasons similar to what you had stated, such as spontaneity (Michael). Analysis of the criticisms and their position in the Argument In my consideration, most of the criticism is nullified by the experience machine. Of course, people could argue that the Experience Machine cannot be applied in reality, however, it inherently makes it worse, that the machine takes away ones knowledge of the falsity of its reality. So individuals who plug-in will not have any knowledge that they are plugged in (Kodali & Venkata). In addition, one have to figure out the response of tailoring machines to have similar life experience today, but people have a different rich culture and family member live to see their old age. In my personal argument concerning the Experience machine, I would argue that the pleasure derived from lifes activities originates from, at least in part, a feature of spontaneity. The development of our personal personalities, psychologies and connections are all the result of chaotic forces and our personal life decisions. To plug into the experience machine, we abandon our identities for a pre-made one. The understanding that the machine is like a super being entity allows us to hypothesize the cores in our life. In essence, it is a way of planning your life out whether you choose to live out your days in the machine. Therefore, human satisfaction, endeavors and pursuit of happiness would be unreal in the machine since they have been pre-designed. Works cited Alpaydin, Ethem. Possible criticisms for Nozecks’s Experience machine. Cambridge, Mass: MIT Press, 2010. Print. Harriet Baber. “The Experience Machine Deconstructed,” University of San Diego. August 2008. Internet resource. Top of Form Lakshminarayana, Kodali, and Reddy K. Venkata. The Experience Machine. New Delhi: New Age International Ltd, 2006. Internet resource. Top of Form Top of Form Matthews, Michael. Nozick, Happiness, and the Experience Machine, 2014. Internet resource. Bottom of Form Bottom of Form Bottom of Form Read More
Cite this document
  • APA
  • MLA
  • CHICAGO
(The Experience Machine Argument Report Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1250 words, n.d.)
The Experience Machine Argument Report Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1250 words. https://studentshare.org/philosophy/1835713-robert-nozick-the-experience-machine
(The Experience Machine Argument Report Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1250 Words)
The Experience Machine Argument Report Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1250 Words. https://studentshare.org/philosophy/1835713-robert-nozick-the-experience-machine.
“The Experience Machine Argument Report Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1250 Words”. https://studentshare.org/philosophy/1835713-robert-nozick-the-experience-machine.
  • Cited: 0 times

CHECK THESE SAMPLES OF The Experience Machine Argument

The Time Machine and A Scientific Romance

Time Traveler counters the argument of the Medical Man about time, which stated that one is unable to move Time and escape from the present time.... Name Institution Course Instructor Date Draft The Time machine and A Scientific Romance Wells in his book “The Time machine” projects his criticism of current life by travelling into the future.... The narrator describes the Journey of Time Traveler who uses a machine Time machine to travel in the future....
8 Pages (2000 words) Essay

Discussion on Modes of Arguments

The argument seems too vaguely discussed that one may relate his assertions to America's incapability of taking on management and technical roles.... The argument posed a bit negative and was not formulated carefully.... This paper analyses the article “The worker next Door” by Barry R....
4 Pages (1000 words) Research Paper

Summarize William Paley's argument

Paley's Teleological argument Derived From A Watch Examination William Paley's narrative regarding a watch one may stumble upon while walking on the road yields several philosophical arguments that may lead to deeper implications and applications in one's life.... On his second argument, he admits to the fallibility of the watch, that even with the best intentions of the creator to make it work efficiently at all times, it may still be vulnerable to defects.... Another argument Paley made was that the existence of the watch in the place found must have followed an order that caused it to land where it is which the watchmaker may not even be aware of....
4 Pages (1000 words) Essay

Analysis of Why the Future Does Not Need Us Article by Bill Joy

The article is a well thought out piece where each and every argument that has been neatly presented holds great value.... Reading Han Morovec's book Robot: Mere machine to Transcendent Mind, Joy's pessimism is enhanced because this book too believes in the fact that the human race would fade as a repercussion to vigorous competition among robotic industries....
4 Pages (1000 words) Essay

The American Splendor Film by Pucini and Berman as Being Adapted from Harvey Pekars Comic Book

the experience is not the same (Lefevre, 2007).... The rest of the paper supports the argument and weighs in on the counterarguments and objections of Lefevre and Harvey.... hellip; This paper is an analysis of the argument of Hight that the Berman and Pucini film 'American Splendor' is successfully adapted from the comic book by Harvey Pekar.... The latter are manual creations, while the latter are machine creations, being photographs....
4 Pages (1000 words) Essay

Textual analysis

The Age of Living Machines and machine Humans in Turkle's “Ghosts in the machine” November 26, 2013 The Age of Living Machines and machine Humans in Turkle's “Ghosts in the machine” During the 1990s, people were already starting to use computers for more than workplace functions, specifically, projecting new/existing/modified images of their identities, while interacting with others online.... In “Ghosts in the machine,” Sherry Turkle (1995) analyzed the effects of using computers on people....
3 Pages (750 words) Assignment

Story of Terry Schiavo

One side of the argument was that regardless of her condition, Terri Schiavo was still alive.... Each side felt that they would be acting morally, and that the opposing side of the argument were being very immoral in their actions.... In these cases, the person is only alive because of the machine....
3 Pages (750 words) Essay

Close to the Machine: Technophilia and its Discontents by Ellen Ullman

So, we see that both Ullman and Joy have talked about repercussions of computers while admitting to their usefulness at the same time; but unlike Ullman, Joy has quoted works of famous people to support his argument, as he thinks that his argument relates to a minority of people.... The paper "Close to the machine: Technophilia and its Discontents by Ellen Ullman" highlights that Like Ullman, Bill Joy has also stated the repercussions of letting machines do all the work, since it will lead to humans not doing any work in future, and all decisions will be made by machines....
1 Pages (250 words) Essay
sponsored ads
We use cookies to create the best experience for you. Keep on browsing if you are OK with that, or find out how to manage cookies.
Contact Us